[MLB-WIRELESS] Public internet access

[Mark Aitken]

David Ashburner wrote:

>
>The gist of the letter Steve received is "would we compete with and be 
>advantaged relative to a commercial provider".
>
>This is a massive loophole that allows them to deny us an exemption.
>
>If we so much as offer anything for free that is an advantage to us for 
>attracting customers ( who may not take up a contract with a commercial 
>provider as a result ) and therefore grounds to reject an exemption.
>
>If we charge for anything then we are commercial and don't qualify for 
>an exemption
>
>catch-22
>
>  
>


Cant an enterprise like Melb Wireless have a fee for membership to a 
"club" and

"oh yea, you get 'free' internet"

???

Mark