[MLB-WIRELESS] telecoms carriers and class licience

[rick]

not really, if you dilibretly tryed to interfere with a commersial link
maybe a fine, but as long as your in legal limits it should be fine

phones and tv repeters and microwave ovens all use 2.4ghz

if a commercial link was actualy needing the link they would have ither used
5.8ghz or paid to use a diffrent freq

or atleast this is how i see it

rick
  -----Original Message-----
  From: owner-melbwireless at wireless.org.au
[mailto:owner-melbwireless at wireless.org.au]On Behalf Of Lee Moyle
  Sent: Thursday, 17 June 2004 10:05 AM
  To: melbwireless at wireless.org.au
  Subject: [MLB-WIRELESS] telecoms carriers and class licience


  Hi All
  Just a quick request if any one knows the answer to what rights does
anyone have using a class licience segment.
  ie: does a telecommunnications carrier operating in 2.4 ghz class spectrum
actualy have any rights if they suffer from interference from any other
service.
  The ACA Act is a long read but it does state that all users can suffer
interference from any other service without complaint as all are treated
equal within the class segment.
  BUT does a Telecommunications carier have any special exemptions to this .

  i guess with all the wireless rollouts using 2.4 and as the interference
levels increase do the isps with carrier liciences have the power to
complain to tha ACA to shut down "interfering" melbourne wireless nodes or
similar?

  Comments please

  Cheers Lee
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wireless.org.au/pipermail/melbwireless/attachments/20040617/7af587d1/attachment.html>