[MLB-WIRELESS] Apache

[sanbar]

Ey Matt,
There's still performance issues with v2. The latest survey at Netcraft
(http://www.netcraft.com) shows just over 1 per cent of *nix web servers
are running v2 compared with more than 98 per cent on v1. Strangely
enough, more than 7 per cent of Microsoft systems are running Apache v2
(including me. Meh, it works OK and I didn't want to run IIS on it). I
tried v2 under Debian for a short while and ran into big problems with
php, so rolled back. I'm running 1.3.27 and can describe the
relationship as long-term stable and loving.
- Barry

On Thu, 2003-04-24 at 09:54, Matt Pearce wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> I am about to start work on building a HTTP server that I can use for my
> home wireless network and was wondering what the difference between version
> 1 (1.3.27) and 2 (2.0.45) ??

-- 
barry park
melbourne wireless node bca http://melbourne.wireless.org.au
community wireless project http://wireless.bur.st
-=all your http_get are belong to us=-


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.wireless.org.au/pipermail/melbwireless/attachments/20030424/c0757890/attachment.sig>