Meanwhile ... Was: Re: Re: [MLB-WIRELESS] locfinder v2 beta

[Matthew Hill]

bazz

thats great you tunneled in via bhh to get to fzj ?

good to see some progress....

keep at it

matt


------------------------------------------
Matthew Hill
Computer Consultant
www.matthewhillonline.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "sanbar" <sandbar at ozemail.com.au>
To: "'MelbWireless'" <melbwireless at wireless.org.au>
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 11:35 AM
Subject: Meanwhile ... Was: Re: Re: [MLB-WIRELESS] locfinder v2 beta


> ... petty infighting among diametrically opposed viewpoints aside - and
> in a pathetic attempt to kill this waste of bandwidth of a thread - the
> serious business of building a wireless network goes on.
>
> Node FZJ was able to make a link to node BCA last night (confirmed by
> the server logs) via node BHH. It's a distance of about 2.03km from
> FZJ-BCA, but via Vak it's about 2.33km. Next step is the jump to
> Fitzroy/Thornbury/Northcote.
>
> Grunties, ffs get an omni up!
>
> Innernorth roqz. Everyone else sux. Now that's the sort of mailing list
> flame bait we need.
> - Barry
>
> On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 09:52, evilbunny wrote:
> > Hello Steven,
> >
> > I didn't mean share without permission, obviously if there are people
> > willing to support, surely they wouldn't have issues with gaining more
> > recognition from supporting others as well...
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >  evilbunny
mailto:evilbunny at sydneywireless.com
> >
> > http://www.cacert.org - Free Security Certificates
> > http://www.nodedb.com - Think globally, network locally
> > http://www.sydneywireless.com - Telecommunications Freedom
> >
> > Tuesday, November 26, 2002, 9:44:27 AM, you wrote:
> >
> > SH> As the data is commercial property, sharing the data would mean
piracy. I
> > SH> will not do anything like this that may put Melbourne Wireless in
disrepute.
> >
> > SH> People pay big money for this data, that we were very lucky to get.
> >
> > SH> Signed,
> > SH> Steven Haigh
> > SH> http://wireless.org.au
> > SH> (Visit https://wireless.org.au to install our Root Certificate.)
> >
> >
> > SH> ----- Original Message -----
> > SH> From: "evilbunny" <evilbunny at sydneywireless.com>
> > SH> To: "Steven Haigh" <netwiz at optusnet.com.au>
> > SH> Cc: "'MelbWireless'" <melbwireless at wireless.org.au>
> > SH> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 3:28 AM
> > SH> Subject: Re[2]: [MLB-WIRELESS] locfinder v2 beta
> >
> >
> > >> Hello Steven,
> > >>
> > >> What no sharing so others can benefit from it?
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Best regards,
> > >>  evilbunny
mailto:evilbunny at sydneywireless.com
> > >>
> > >> http://www.cacert.org - Free Security Certificates
> > >> http://www.nodedb.com - Think globally, network locally
> > >> http://www.sydneywireless.com - Telecommunications Freedom
> > >>
> > >> Monday, November 25, 2002, 10:32:36 PM, you wrote:
> > >>
> > >> SH> I think the main difference is that nodedb.com still relies on
> > SH> mapblast (or
> > >> SH> whoever) for their maps... while this is good and works well, it
has
> > SH> nothing
> > >> SH> like the detail that can be achieved by using our own data. The
data
> > SH> in
> > >> SH> question covers everything from street names, major features to
house
> > >> SH> divisions - where you can zoom down to the block where your
> > >> SH> house/node/whatever is... This detail is just not available from
any
> > SH> other
> > >> SH> source...
> > >>
> > >> SH> This also means that if mapblast goes down, then our maps don't
go
> > SH> down...
> > >> SH> It also gives much more flexibility...
> > >>
> > >> SH> NodeDB is great, but it's much better for Melbourne Wireless to
have
> > >> SH> detailed maps of Melbourne & Victoria, than anywhere else in the
> > SH> world -
> > >> SH> because that's where it's of most use to members and followers of
> > SH> Melbourne
> > >> SH> Wireless...
> > >>
> > >> SH> I don't think this is re-inventing the wheel at all, it's more a
> > SH> greatly
> > >> SH> improved bearings and suspension.... they all do the same job,
but why
> > SH> not
> > >> SH> make the ride comfy :)
> > >>
> > >> SH> Signed,
> > >> SH> Steven Haigh
> > >> SH> http://wireless.org.au
> > >> SH> (Visit https://wireless.org.au to install our Root Certificate.)
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> SH> ----- Original Message -----
> > >> SH> From: "Scott Stapleton" <hyrax at westnet.com.au>
> > >> SH> To: "'MelbWireless'" <melbwireless at wireless.org.au>
> > >> SH> Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 5:51 PM
> > >> SH> Subject: RE: [MLB-WIRELESS] locfinder v2 beta
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> >> > -----Original Message-----
> > >> >> > From: owner-melbwireless at wireless.org.au
> > >> >> > [mailto:owner-melbwireless at wireless.org.au] On Behalf Of James
Healy
> > >> >> > Sent: Monday, 25 November 2002 11:20 AM
> > >> >> > To: MelbWireless
> > >> >> > Subject: [MLB-WIRELESS] locfinder v2 beta
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > rejoice.. be merry.. locfinder v2 is almost upon us...
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > v2 is a total rewrite from v1, using php and a MySQL backend.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Not meant to be rude, but why re-invent the wheel. The Nodedb is
doing
> > >> >> an excellent job of keeping track of nodes. What significant
> > >> >> improvements does LOCFinder offer over the NodeDB?
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Obviously there is still Sydney vs. Melbourne problems, hence why
steve
> > >> >> never decided to link to the NodeDB which was massively better
than
> > >> >> LOCFinder v1. Which is why the NodeDB for Melborne has 200-odd
nodes,
> > >> >> instead of the 600 - 800 or whatever the figure is.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> My 2 cents: "More wanky eastern states BS"
> > >> >>
> > >> >> .. Scott
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo at wireless.org.au
> > >> >> with "unsubscribe melbwireless" in the body of the message
> > >> >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> SH> To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo at wireless.org.au
> > >> SH> with "unsubscribe melbwireless" in the body of the message
> > >>
> --
>
> barry park
> http://wireless.bur.st ||| community wireless project
> http://melbourne.wireless.org.au ||| melbourne wireless node bca
> -=all your http_get are belong to us=-
>
>
> To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo at wireless.org.au
> with "unsubscribe melbwireless" in the body of the message
>


To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo at wireless.org.au
with "unsubscribe melbwireless" in the body of the message