[MLB-WIRELESS] IP addressing, OSPF and a .plan

[Justin]

Howdy again,

 Been reading the archives, and read most of the messages
 about IP addressing.

 I know some people don't want to talk about it, but it
 seemed that there was *almost* a decision made to use
 net 10 for clients and net 172.16.0.0 - 172.31.255.255
 for links.

 Also, there was *almost* a decision made to use OSPF.

 Ok, next step... how about a plan? For those that want
 to build true permanent RAN access points / links etc,
 can we note them down and work out a plan on setting
 up these permanent access point / links and interconnect
 them? 

 (yes I know that's the goal, but I'd like to know my
 node is helping link others together, and see the plan
 of how I fit into the goal as opposed to just hacking,
 guessing and hoping)

 I think if we want to build a real RAN, then these 
 topics need to be decided on soon. 

 Can we just decide to adopt net 10, net 172.16 and OSPF
 until something better comes along? How does the saying
 go... 'results not perfection' ??

 Should we vote? Put it up on the web site for a while.

Regards,
Gaz.




 


--
To unsubscribe, send mail to minordomo at wireless.org.au with a subject of 'unsubscribe melbwireless'  
Archive at: http://www.wireless.org.au/cgi-bin/minorweb.pl?A=LIST&L=melbwireless
IRC at: au.austnet.org #melb-wireless