[MLB-WIRELESS] New submissions to the wireless broadband inquiry

[Barry Park]

My gripe is that this is a poisoned submission. It's just a shame that they
will probably not be called to back up what is fundamentally a flawed
submission with hard evidence of wrongdoing by either corporate or community
groups. Hell, the way it is worded, IDS must believe there is already a
working community network already out there openly flouting ACA guidelines.
I just hope the inquiry panel see through it.
- Barry

-----Original Message-----
From: Jamie Lovick <jalovick at doof.org>
To: melbwireless at wireless.org.au <melbwireless at wireless.org.au>
Date: Thursday, June 06, 2002 10:03 PM
Subject: Re: [MLB-WIRELESS] New submissions to the wireless broadband
inquiry


>Personally, I think the best way to tackle this is to prove them wrong.




*********************************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it may be legally privileged 
and confidential.  If you are not the intended recipient of this email,
you must not disclose or use the information contained in it.  If you 
have received this email in error, please notify us by return email and 
permanently delete the document.
*********************************************************************************

To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo at wireless.org.au
with "unsubscribe melbwireless" in the body of the message