[MLB-WIRELESS] IP address range for Geelong?

[Andy Freeman]

Adrian,
	Thanks for adding some sense to the discussion.

>>10.200.0.0/16 sounded OK to me, given current constraints.
>>10.200.0.0/26 for the first node - a 64 block should be enough for one
site, or more if they need it. 

Sounds like a good starting point.  I'm not sure that for ease of
routing and "newbie" configuration that class C blocks wouldn't make
more sense but I think that is a discussion for "Geelong Wireless".

I believe (and I'm only speaking for my-self) that while I enjoy the
banter and ideas on the list we have a unique opportunity in Geelong to
actually get started with a "real deployment" and "just pick the bits we
like" from Melbourne Wireless.  A bit of a test-bed if you like.

The Geelong guys will put together a discussion paper and might meet in
a pub one night to thrash it out.  An IP range that doesn't conflict
with Melbourne Wireless is great way to start.


Cheers,
               Andy.



--
To unsubscribe, send mail to minordomo at wireless.org.au with a subject of 'unsubscribe melbwireless'  
Archive at: http://www.wireless.org.au/cgi-bin/minorweb.pl?A=LIST&L=melbwireless
IRC at: au.austnet.org #melb-wireless