<div dir="ltr">If future, maybe a new node status ('stale'? 'expired'? 'just resting'?) which things can go to automatically after time-out if not connected or kept updated. This lets the node data be retained in case of recovery, but would not show up as clutter in normal search and map results.<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 21 April 2015 at 10:21, Tony Langdon <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:vk3jed@vkradio.com" target="_blank">vk3jed@vkradio.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"><span class="">
<div>On 21/04/2015 10:12 AM, Ryan Abbenhuys
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
<pre>Can I garner any support for a simple node database cull? Something along the lines of any nodes where the age is greater than 1800 days (approx 5 years) and their status is still only "Interested", "Gathering", or "Testing".</pre>
</div>
</blockquote></span>
Sounds like a good idea. I'm a good example, if my nodes are
listed, they're of no use, as I haven't lived in Melbourne for
almost 5 years. If there was interest in Bendigo, I'd simply create
a new listing.<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
<pre cols="72">--
73 de Tony VK3JED/VK3IRL
<a href="http://vkradio.com" target="_blank">http://vkradio.com</a></pre>
</font></span></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Melbwireless mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Melbwireless@lists.wireless.org.au">Melbwireless@lists.wireless.org.au</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.wireless.org.au/mailman/listinfo/melbwireless" target="_blank">https://lists.wireless.org.au/mailman/listinfo/melbwireless</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature">Dan.</div>
</div>