[MLB-WIRELESS] You guys know much about this stuff from DLINK - D-Link AirPlus Xtreme G

Craig Sanders cas at taz.net.au
Thu Jan 9 14:02:02 EST 2003


On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 05:45:11PM -0800, Drew wrote:
> <snip>
> >also from the spec sheet:
> >
> >54Mbps -68dbm
> >.
> >.
> >.
> >1Mbps  -89dbm
> >
> >i think you'd have to have the 802.11g devices sitting within a few
> >feet of each other to get 54Mbps out of them....and if you're that
> >close, why not use a 100baseT card and a full-duplex switch?
>
> Keep in mind this is DLink gear. Not every manufacturer's rx
> sensitivity should suck that bad.

the thing is, i don't think that the dlink does suck that badly.  i've
got a 900AP+ myself and i'm quite happy with it.  the dlink's Rx
sensitivity is nowhere near as good as, say, the cisco cards (IIRC, -94
or -95dbm @1Mbps) but they're at least average.  there are worse cards,
but not many that are better...and those that are better cost 2 or 3
times the price.

i suspect that 802.11g is going to be very long on promise, and very
short on delivery.  no matter who manufactures the card.  it's just a
Big Number<tm> in an industry where Big Numbers sell product, regardless
of the actual relationship between reality & the Big Number in question.

"wow! this 802.11g card is capable of 54Mbps.  that's really uber-cool,
so i'll ignore the fact that for all practical purposes it's no better
than this 802.11b card that will get the same 1 or 2Mbps that i'll
actually get in real life usage".



802.11g might make a difference inside an office (which is, after all,
the primary market for WiFi devices), but it's going to make no
difference at all for long-distance links.

craig

-- 
craig sanders <cas at taz.net.au>

Fabricati Diem, PVNC.
 -- motto of the Ankh-Morpork City Watch

To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo at wireless.org.au
with "unsubscribe melbwireless" in the body of the message



More information about the Melbwireless mailing list