Network defences, was Re: [MLB-WIRELESS] [TECH] Dipole antennas, and melbwireless structure

[Ben Anderson]

> At 08:16 PM 19/03/2002 +1100, Adrian Close wrote:
>
> >Some kind of network karma thing might be appropriate.  But that implies
> >people authenticating and identifying themselves somehow (mind you, those
> >could just be aliases/nyms, which might be more palatable).
>
> Just some form of consistent ID is all that's needed...

knowing the physical location of the source/destination node is more
worrying than having a mojo ID attached.

> >This is one of those "learn from the mistakes of the Internet builders",
> >methinks.  Spam, DoS et al.  We have a chance to do something a little
> >better...
>
> Good point. :)  Unfortunately, a lot of ppl will take what they can and
> give little, if anything. :(

Give me real examples of problems with my network design, and I'll do my
best to solve them on paper before it gets anywhere near implimentation.

Ben.


--
To unsubscribe, send mail to minordomo at wireless.org.au with a subject of 'unsubscribe melbwireless'  
Archive at: http://www.wireless.org.au/cgi-bin/minorweb.pl?A=LIST&L=melbwireless
IRC at: au.austnet.org #melb-wireless