[MLB-WIRELESS] [proposal] IP allocation (was: DNS, DHCP, static ip... )
drew at no6.com
Wed Nov 21 19:02:46 EST 2001
I think everyone agreed that 10.0.0.x would be reserved?
on a side note, has anyone played with this?
Jonathan Oxer wrote:
>>the following is roughly based on the SeattleWireless scheme, but
>>altered somewhat to cope with more geographical area, and an absence of
>>top-down structuring, since i think that is silly at this time.
>Looks fine to me, except possibly for the selection of 10.0.x.x as the
>range: I'd prefer something slightly more obscure, like 10.5.x.x or
>whatever, because I already have 10.0.0.x used on a network I'd like to
>connect. I suspect a lot of private LANs would start at 10.0.0.1 and work up.
>I know the IP range issue has been hashed over before, just thought I'd put
>my 2c in.
>Internet Vision Technologies
>To unsubscribe, send mail to minordomo at melbwireless.dyndns.org with a subject of 'unsubscribe melbwireless'
>Archive at: http://melbwireless.dyndns.org/cgi-bin/minorweb.pl?A=LIST&L=melbwireless
>IRC at: au.austnet.org #melb-wireless
To unsubscribe, send mail to minordomo at melbwireless.dyndns.org with a subject of 'unsubscribe melbwireless'
Archive at: http://melbwireless.dyndns.org/cgi-bin/minorweb.pl?A=LIST&L=melbwireless
IRC at: au.austnet.org #melb-wireless
More information about the Melbwireless