<div dir="ltr">You probably shouldn't be using 5.1/5.2 Outdoors as per ACMA Regulations.</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 10:02 AM Daurnimator <<a href="mailto:quae@daurnimator.com">quae@daurnimator.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 at 16:04, Vincent Hii (NS) <<a href="mailto:vhii@netspace.net.au" target="_blank">vhii@netspace.net.au</a>> wrote:><br>
> How well are the Powerbeam 5ac running?  What average distance and<br>
> 20/40/80mhz channel size?<br>
<br>
There's a lot of different links on the network, I can't say I have<br>
any idea of the average.<br>
The older powerbeam 5m runs better at 5.1-5.2 GHz compared to the AC.<br>
<br>
To give you some examples:<br>
  - I have a 1km link that goes at ~500Mbps.<br>
  - I have a 3km link that goes at ~280Mbps.<br>
  - I have a 29km link that goes between 12 and 50Mbps, but it's<br>
partially obstructed.<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Melbwireless mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Melbwireless@lists.wireless.org.au" target="_blank">Melbwireless@lists.wireless.org.au</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.wireless.org.au/mailman/listinfo/melbwireless" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.wireless.org.au/mailman/listinfo/melbwireless</a><br>
</blockquote></div>