<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Hi Peter,<br>
<br>
Yes, that seems to have done the trick. However, It looks like
wireless client Isolation is enabled on GHO-North-58, and this may
be the reason why we were having this problem (As HVC was a client
on GHO-North-58, and couldn't route to other client nodes on this AP
due to isolation)<br>
<br>
Rob.<br>
<br>
On 12/03/2012 3:35 AM, Peter Buncle wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:D8B6081712400F449FDC8A403E1C4C6D08DAF3@fserver.nmc.local"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered
medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";
color:black;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0cm;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0cm;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";
color:black;}
p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text Char";
margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:8.0pt;
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";
color:black;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
span.BalloonTextChar
{mso-style-name:"Balloon Text Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text";
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";
color:black;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">HI
Guy’s<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">I’ve
change the way the routing works on this interface.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Is
it better now ?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:blue"
lang="EN-US">Kind Regards</span><span
style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"
lang="EN-US"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"
lang="EN-US"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:blue"
lang="EN-US">Peter <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:blue"
lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"
lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF
1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext"
lang="EN-US">From:</span></b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext"
lang="EN-US"> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:melbwireless-bounces@lists.wireless.org.au">melbwireless-bounces@lists.wireless.org.au</a>
[<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:melbwireless-bounces@lists.wireless.org.au">mailto:melbwireless-bounces@lists.wireless.org.au</a>] <b>On
Behalf Of </b>Robert Haines<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, 6 March 2012 8:52 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> David Nuttall;
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:melbwireless@lists.wireless.org.au">melbwireless@lists.wireless.org.au</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [MLB-WIRELESS] Strange routingissues
on 10.10.129.64/28 (GHO-North-5.8/HVC??)<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Hi David,<br>
<br>
Great!! I'm not going mad!<br>
<br>
Looks like I need to talk to Peter (JIA) ... think we need to
tempoarily shut down this interface on HVC until they plug the
cord back in on JIA!<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
<br>
Rob<br>
<br>
On 6/03/2012 12:34 AM, David Nuttall wrote: <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">Hi Robert,<br>
<br>
Things are going OK till you get to JLP at Heidelberg.
(10.10.81.33 is the incoming interface from Box Hill)<br>
<br>
After that is where it goes bad.<br>
<br>
If it goes direct to GHO (10.10.80.5) all is good.<br>
If it goes via HVC (10.10.2.225) it gets lost.<br>
<br>
1) Looking at OSPF at JLP right now, it wants to send traffic
to 10.10.129.64/28 via HVC with a cost of 20! There is a cost
of 10 from JLP to HVC. That suggests 10.10.129.64/28 is
directly connected to HVC with a cost of 10 on it's interface.<br>
<br>
2) I pinged all of the addresses in 10.10.129.64/28 from JLP
and a response came back from 10.10.129.70 on the HVC
interface. Time was 1 mS.<br>
<br>
3) So it looks like you are right, 10.10.129.64/28 is on both
HVC and GHO.<br>
<br>
4) A couple of guesses.... Maybe an attempt to directly link
HVC with GHO after JIA died? Maybe JIA was bridging HVC and
GHO? Someone will know!<br>
<br>
Dave.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:windowtext"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p><span style="color:windowtext">Message protected by
MailGuard: e-mail anti-virus, anti-spam and content
filtering.<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.mailguard.com.au/mg">http://www.mailguard.com.au/mg</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:windowtext"> <br>
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>