<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Kim Hawtin wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:49B0574D.2050407@adelaide.edu.au" type="cite"><br>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
perhaps i'm tired of folks saying we can fix all these problems with MORE POWER!!!!!!
pushing out more power just means more background noise for everyone else.
and now doubt attracts unwanted attention.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
True, although I am not concerned about attracting attention coz it is
within my license conditions <br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:49B0574D.2050407@adelaide.edu.au" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">ethernet isn't designed to be push long distance, in order to get reliable links over
25KM you need to fiddle with timeouts and hack on the drivers to make sure they hang
on to fragmented packets for longer, which effects the buffer sizes and so on.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
hasnt OpenWRT gone a long way in assisting with this?<br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:49B0574D.2050407@adelaide.edu.au" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">if amateurs have 100 watts to play with, and they have lots of bandwidth to play with
and we're talking about much longer distances, then surely there are better suited
modes for this kind of work?
</pre>
</blockquote>
It is an unfortunate turn of events that has seen HAM radio taken from
the forefront of technological development in the <br>
post war years to just another hobby group waiting for the next big
break through by the corporate world!!<br>
<br>
Generally we are at the mercy of the consumer market. However, that
being said, what hams do well is to take a <br>
commercial concept, adopt it and push it to its limits of its use
either by peripheral devices or redevelopment of the<br>
base product, but, sadly, most of us are appliance operators.<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:49B0574D.2050407@adelaide.edu.au" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">besides, if its an amateur sending the traffic is only between amateurs, so its not a
useful part of the network as other users can't use it. unless, of course they too
are HAMs ...
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
again, we are at the mercy of our masters, regulations! not a great lot
we can do about it but that doesnt mean we shouldnt try.<br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:49B0574D.2050407@adelaide.edu.au" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">so bandying this talk of some HAMs can extend the network with $LOTSA watts is irrelevant,
AFAIC.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
maybe? maybe a change in the regulations as to carrying third party
traffic is needed??? I dont have all the answers.<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:49B0574D.2050407@adelaide.edu.au" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">regards,
Kim
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>