<div dir="ltr">On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Sunnz <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sunnzy@gmail.com">sunnzy@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
2008/7/23 Sjors Provoost <<a href="mailto:sjors@sprovoost.nl">sjors@sprovoost.nl</a>>:<br>
<div class="Ih2E3d">><br>
> We have only connected myself (11 Mbit is still a bit slow in my standards;<br>
> I won't share that...). And I pay $30 dollars a month for twice that in The<br>
> Netherlands. Assuming the equipment lasts for 5 years (or at least the link<br>
> becomes irrelevant because Australia might, , I hope, be bathing in cheap<br>
> broadband by that time and Moore's law will make 11 Mbit sound pathetic), I<br>
> would be looking at a bill of $400 dollars a month, plus actual internet,<br>
> plus maintance.<br>
><br>
<br>
</div>Hey I didn't know that network speeds obey the Moore's law as well...<br>
or do they??<br>
</blockquote><div><br>Probably not from a hardware point of view, but from a price-per-GB point of view it does get cheaper, fast. Not here though :-)<br><br>Sjors </div></div></div>