<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Tony Langdon, VK3JED wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid200708140352.l7E3q3ZX025115@localhost.localdomain"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">At 12:54 PM 8/14/2007, Zik Saleeba wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">This story appeared on the OzAPRS (ham radio) list today and I thought
it might interest you guys.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Was a giggle, though it also shows that it's a good thing for all
parties to play nice. :-) The issue of interference is one reason
I'm hesitant to run much more than wifi power levels in any mode on
2.4 GHz (e.g. if I get ATV up and running on 2.4 GHz). Yes, I know I
can, legally, but it's not conducive to good karma to do so. ;) As
far as wifi goes, it's much easier to just run within the class
licence. More nodes to talk to and one doesn't have to care too much
about who's allowed to associate with your node (beyond any security
and other routine parameters).
73 de VK3JED
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://vkradio.com">http://vkradio.com</a>
_</pre>
</blockquote>
I dont agree tony, although I would not want to willing interfere with
others, I have a studied for and payed for<br>
entitlement to utilize certain portions of the spectrum. ATV would
only need to be around 15MHz at the bottom<br>
of the band so wifiers who may suffer any non intentional interference
could change freq, as is there option, where<br>
as, I as a 2.4GHz ATVer have limited options as to band planning for
said mode.<br>
<br>
To highlight and example, LIPD, dont they cause us havoc on 70cm,
yet they are entitled to utilize these devices and<br>
we must suffer interference from them, thank god for CTCSS!!<br>
<br>
Now what would be good to see, would be transverters for WiFi Hams
that could take the 2.4GHz wifi and upconvert <br>
it to the 9cm, 6cm, 3cm and/or 1.25cm bands with un-restricted power
output, mmmhhhh hhhmmmm. :>)<br>
<br>
But that is off topic.<br>
<br>
Regards<br>
<br>
Mark<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>