<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Chris Samuel wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid200612152141.33015.chris@csamuel.org" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Thursday 14 December 2006 12:13 pm, Fenn Bailey wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">G'day all,
Just wondering if anyone had played much with any of the 802.11 Pre-N gear
and what they've thought. I've had a couple of people tell me it's pretty
amazing in terms of propegation/speeds/etc.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Not here, but this comment in Wikipedia about pre-N gear doesn't sound too
hopeful:
</pre>
</blockquote>
It stands to reason that in order to obtain PreN type speeds that the
one thing required is<br>
spectrum, so no more none overlapping channels in PreN, it just uses
it all. Which naturally<br>
would wipe out all other nearby systems, as well as probaly cause
detremental interference<br>
to other systems further afield. <br>
<br>
Maybe PreN should have been a 5GHz protocol only. But when it all
boils down to it, manufactures<br>
dont care what your link is like that just want your money!<br>
<br>
Regards<br>
<br>
Mark<br>
<br>
NodeGXT/VK3JMA<br>
</body>
</html>