> The issue with wireless is that by carrying third party data 
> (eg internet) over links between different locations you are 
> providing a carriage service which would require a carrier 
> licence, unless you fall under the noncommercial exemption.

As opposed to APANA, which uses commercial telcos to provide the carriage
services.
> 
> That exemption is specifically for wireless carriage, so 
> using APANA as an example isn't really relevant... UNLESS 
> they've been providing services via wireless. (if they have 
> then I'd be very interested to hear about it)

I'm not aware of them providing wireless, and I suspect they've probably had
similar types of discussions internally! :-)