<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2180" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Well here is my BGP config that i am using between
fuu and node fut,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I have noticed that the route to fuu dosent seem to
disapear as much with bgp as it did when i was using ospf, They only exchange
info about once a minute And it is tcp.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>This is a very basic setup.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>basically node fuu has my ip 10.10.128.100 and my
as number</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV>! -*- bgp -*-</DIV>
<DIV>!</DIV>
<DIV>! BGPd configuration file</DIV>
<DIV>!</DIV>
<DIV>! $Id: bgpd.conf,v 1.1.1.1 2002/12/13 20:15:29 Paul Exp $</DIV>
<DIV>!</DIV>
<DIV>hostname bgpd</DIV>
<DIV>password XXXXX</DIV>
<DIV>enable password XXXXX</DIV>
<DIV>!</DIV>
<DIV>!bgp multiple-instance</DIV>
<DIV>!</DIV>
<DIV>router bgp 7675</DIV>
<DIV>! you are not allowed to use this number 7675 it is public</DIV>
<DIV>bgp router-id 10.10.129.145</DIV>
<DIV>redistribute ospf</DIV>
<DIV>redistribute connected</DIV>
<DIV>network 10.0.0.0/8</DIV>
<DIV>neighbor 10.10.128.97 remote-as 7676</DIV>
<DIV>! neighbor 10.10.128.97 distribute-list local_nets in</DIV>
<DIV>! neighbor 10.10.128.97 route-map set-nexthop out</DIV>
<DIV>! neighbor 10.10.128.97 ebgp-multihop</DIV>
<DIV>! neighbor 10.10.128.97 next-hop-self</DIV>
<DIV>!</DIV>
<DIV>access-list all permit any</DIV>
<DIV>!</DIV>
<DIV>!route-map set-nexthop permit 10</DIV>
<DIV>! match ip address all</DIV>
<DIV>! set ip next-hop 10.0.0.1</DIV>
<DIV>!</DIV>
<DIV>debug bgp events</DIV>
<DIV>debug bgp filters</DIV>
<DIV>debug bgp fsm</DIV>
<DIV>debug bgp keepalives</DIV>
<DIV>debug bgp updates</DIV>
<DIV>!log file bgpd.log</DIV>
<DIV>!</DIV>
<DIV>log stdout</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><A href="mailto:ivile01@yahoo.com.au"><FONT face=Arial
size=2>ivile01@yahoo.com.au</FONT></A><FONT face=Arial size=2> | </FONT><A
href="mailto:ivile@ivile.bur.st"><FONT face=Arial
size=2>ivile@ivile.bur.st</FONT></A><BR><A href="http://bur.st/~ivile"><FONT
face=Arial size=2>http://bur.st/~ivile</FONT></A><FONT face=Arial size=2>
(waveguides) | </FONT><A href="http://ivile.bur.st"><FONT face=Arial
size=2>http://ivile.bur.st</FONT></A><FONT face=Arial size=2> | </FONT><A
href="http://ivile.bur.st/ivile/64/"><FONT face=Arial
size=2>http://ivile.bur.st/ivile/64/</FONT></A><FONT face=Arial size=2> (my
car)<BR></FONT><A href="http://www.melbourne.wireless.org.au/users/?ivile"><FONT
face=Arial
size=2>http://www.melbourne.wireless.org.au/users/?ivile</FONT></A></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>----- Original Message ----- </FONT>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>From: "Nigel" <</FONT><A
href="mailto:thenigel@hotmail.com"><FONT face=Arial
size=2>thenigel@hotmail.com</FONT></A><FONT face=Arial size=2>></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>To: <</FONT><A
href="mailto:melbwireless@wireless.org.au"><FONT face=Arial
size=2>melbwireless@wireless.org.au</FONT></A><FONT face=Arial
size=2>></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 11:22 AM</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Subject: [MLB-WIRELESS] OSPF BGP</FONT></DIV></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial><BR><FONT size=2></FONT></FONT></DIV><FONT face=Arial
size=2>> Dan, and others,<BR>> <BR>> Thank you for the nice comments on
my router webpage. It appears<BR>> that a lot of people don't really know how
to set up OSPF or BGP (me<BR>> being one of them!).<BR>> <BR>> I think
it would be a good idea to give a presentation on routing for<BR>> the
Melbourne wireless network, bearing in mind that a lot of us are<BR>> not
computer, network or linux gurus. It would be nice to go over<BR>> the basics
as well as some of the Melbourne wireless requirements,<BR>> like dead
intervals and costs.<BR>> <BR>> Do we have any volunteers?????<BR>>
<BR>> Nigel<BR>> node GWS<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> ------------<BR>>
<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> Ryan, what would you suggest for GHO? Are three
2.4GHz interfaces -<BR>> each on<BR>> a different channel serving a
different area - not an improvement<BR>> over a<BR>> single interface? A
5.8GHz interface is also planned. At the moment<BR>> the<BR>> idea is to
allow people to connect from wherever they can to do signal<BR>> strength and
data rate testing. We should also start experimenting<BR>> with<BR>>
network Quality-of-Service (QoS) applications and be measuring their<BR>>
usefulness.<BR>> <BR>> FYI, as of this writing:<BR>> <BR>> GHO-North
has two OSPF clients:<BR>> 10.10.129.3 Node GWS - nice webpage and
propagating 13 /28 subnets!<BR>> - also propagating 127.0.0.1.
Naughty!<BR>> 10.10.129.4 Node IKD - no webpage and is propagating
192.168.20.0/24<BR>> - and 192.168.60.0/24 onto the network. Naughty!<BR>>
- nice work on the long link though. :)<BR>> <BR>> GHO-South also has two
OSPF clients:<BR>> 10.10.130.178 Node GES - propagating 4 /28 subnet, a /30
and a nice<BR>> webpage<BR>> 10.10.130.180 Node FKR - propagating 3 /28
subnets. (no webpage on the<BR>> router)<BR>> <BR>> GHO-Mobile has one
OSPF client:<BR>> 10.10.131.70 - Node FUT - propagating 3 /28 subnets and a
nice webpage<BR>> <BR>> Running ARP on the GHO router reveals no other
clients connected at<BR>> all.<BR>> <BR>> Of course, too many clients
on any one AP will cause it to slow right<BR>> down<BR>> with hidden-node
problems - negating GHO's usefulness. So I believe<BR>> the<BR>>
longer-term plan is to work out who are the best candidate nodes to<BR>>
retain a<BR>> permanent direct-link to GHO. Once chosen, only they will be
allowed<BR>> access. I would hope that the method used to choose these nodes
is<BR>> fair and<BR>> open, and provides the best technical outcome for
the overall network.<BR>> Perhaps some generally-agreed-upon official
guidelines should be<BR>> drawn up so<BR>> that everyone is clear on what
is required to become a permanent<BR>> client of<BR>> Node GHO. If we
don't I can see GHO becoming a source of discontent<BR>> and<BR>>
dissatisfaction once again.<BR>> <BR>> At this point I'd say that the most
likely nodes to be allowed to<BR>> retain a<BR>> GHO connection are those
who serve traffic to a cluster of Melbourne<BR>> Wireless nodes. GHO is too
important to allow permanent leaf-node<BR>> access,<BR>> except maybe on
the "GHO-Mobile" interface, or to providers of<BR>> important<BR>> content
to the network.<BR>> <BR>> The point is important enough to be made
again:<BR>> For technical reasons, GHO cannot offer open-slather access if it
is<BR>> to be<BR>> truly useful to the Melbourne Wireless network. Just
because you<BR>> *can*<BR>> connect to it doesn't necessarily mean you
*should* connect to it.<BR>> If you<BR>> can connect to a more local node,
please do so. If you can set up a<BR>> multi-radio routing node in your area,
even better!<BR>> <BR>> Cheers,<BR>> <BR>> Dan<BR>> <BR>> To
unsubscribe: send mail to </FONT><A
href="mailto:majordomo@wireless.org.au"><FONT face=Arial
size=2>majordomo@wireless.org.au</FONT></A><BR><FONT face=Arial size=2>> with
"unsubscribe melbwireless" in the body of the
message<BR>></FONT></BODY></HTML>