<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1170" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2>Jason.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2>here are my plans</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2>3 lans in seperated via wireless.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2>lan 1 ips 10.10.160.0/29* and
10.10.160.8/29**</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2>lan 2 ips 10.10.160.72/29</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2>lan 3 ips 10.10.160.64/29</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2>* the ap for this subnet is connecting into a eth
card in my linux server, not into a switch.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2>** these ips are for my lan</FONT></DIV></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2>So for each ap in each lan, shall i just assign
it an ip from its own subnet for each ap</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2>ap in lan 1 10.10.160.1</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2>ap in lan 2 10.10.160.73</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2>ap in lan 3 10.10.160.65</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2>All set in bridge mode will they see each other
therefore all wired and wireless computers can see each other?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2>Thanks.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2>Matt</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Verdana size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=jhecker@www.wireless.org.au
href="mailto:jhecker@www.wireless.org.au">Jason Hecker</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
title=matthew.hill@matthewhillonline.com
href="mailto:matthew.hill@matthewhillonline.com">Matthew Hill</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Cc:</B> <A title=melbwireless@wireless.org.au
href="mailto:melbwireless@wireless.org.au">Melbourne Wireless</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, May 28, 2003 6:04
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [MLB-WIRELESS] D-Link
Bridging</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>I just used two free static IP's on the subnet as the class C
subnet is<BR>the same in both premises.<BR><BR>For example, you could do
this:<BR><BR>192.168.0.254 - internet gateway and
firewall<BR>192.168.0.253 - wireless bridge
1<BR>192.168.0.252 - wireless bridge 2<BR><BR>192.168.0.1-100 -
IP's in one building<BR>192.168.0.101-200 - IP's in other
building.<BR><BR>DHCP works across the bridge too, so you don't have to
partition the IP's <BR>up like I did in the two lines above. It'd be
like one big happy subnet <BR>spanning two sites. As usual, don't have
more than one DHCP server up.<BR><BR>The bridges also figure out which MAC
address lie on which side of the <BR>link so it doesn't unnecessarily ship
ethernet frames over that it doesn't <BR>have to.<BR><BR><BR>On Wed, 28 May
2003, Matthew Hill wrote:<BR><BR>> Yo im interested in this as
well.<BR>> <BR>> what ip address do u set the each ap to ? does the ap
ip stay in the<BR>> same range as its wired network, or does it obtain one
from the other<BR>> wired range, of from a seperate wireless range.<BR>>
<BR>> cheers<BR>> <BR>> matthew<BR>> ----- Original
Message ----- <BR>> From: Jason Hecker <BR>> To:
Jason Tedesco <BR>> Cc: <A
href="mailto:melbwireless@wireless.org.au">melbwireless@wireless.org.au</A>
<BR>> Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 3:34 PM<BR>>
Subject: Re: [MLB-WIRELESS] D-Link Bridging<BR>> <BR>>
<BR>> Yah,<BR>> <BR>> If you have good line
of sight and a good solid signal, the bridge mode in <BR>> the
DWL-900AP+'s work's fantastically (for me anyway). Make sure you
<BR>> install v2.50 of the firmware as they ship with
v2.1.<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> j<BR>> <BR>> On
Wed, 28 May 2003, Jason Tedesco wrote:<BR>> <BR>> > I
remember a while ago, a little talk about how D-Links handle bridging, or
maybe lack off. <BR>> > <BR>> > I
currently have two switches in opposite ends of my house. I want to
bridge these two switches with either a DWL-900+ or the DWL-1000.
<BR>> > <BR>> > Has anyone had any
problems in bridging something similar to my set up with D-Links? Is the
bridging feature in D-Links now stable and robust? Any info would be
appreciated.<BR>> > <BR>> >
Thanks,<BR>> > # jason<BR>> >
<BR>> > To unsubscribe: send mail to <A
href="mailto:majordomo@wireless.org.au">majordomo@wireless.org.au</A><BR>>
> with "unsubscribe melbwireless" in the body of the
message<BR>> > <BR>> <BR>> --
<BR>> Cheers,<BR>> jASON<BR>>
---------------------------------------------<BR>> --== <A
href="http://www.wireless.org.au/~jhecker">http://www.wireless.org.au/~jhecker</A>
==--<BR>> ---------------------------------------------<BR>>
<BR>> <BR>> To unsubscribe: send mail to <A
href="mailto:majordomo@wireless.org.au">majordomo@wireless.org.au</A><BR>>
with "unsubscribe melbwireless" in the body of the message<BR>> <BR><BR>--
<BR>Cheers,<BR>jASON<BR>---------------------------------------------<BR>--==
<A
href="http://www.wireless.org.au/~jhecker">http://www.wireless.org.au/~jhecker</A>
==--<BR>---------------------------------------------<BR><BR><BR>To
unsubscribe: send mail to <A
href="mailto:majordomo@wireless.org.au">majordomo@wireless.org.au</A><BR>with
"unsubscribe melbwireless" in the body of the
message<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>