<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2650.12">
<TITLE>RE: [MLB-WIRELESS] IP Addressing</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Someone who knows what they're doing can modify the IPAllocation Wiki page and make it clear what ranges people should be within depending on what they are doing.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>I assume the only people who will require ranges will be people running Access Points? Won't anyone wanting to connect to an AP then just speak to them to receieve a static IP within their range or be allocated one via DHCP?</FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>I don't see a reason that every individual or even people just doing their own point to point links will need to pick a range and be listed on the page.</FONT></P>
<BR>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>-----Original Message-----</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>From: Justin [<A HREF="mailto:littlejuz@optusnet.com.au">mailto:littlejuz@optusnet.com.au</A>]</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Sent: Tuesday, 9 April 2002 10:55</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Gents,</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2> These are the ranges we have been talking about for a month</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2> or two now. No one has suggested anything better, so how do</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2> we go about making it 'official' and start allocating IPs?</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Regards,</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Gaz.</FONT>
</P>
<CODE><FONT SIZE=3><BR>
<BR>
___________________________<BR>
<BR>
WARNING<BR>
This email and any attachment may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient you are not authorised to copy or disclose all or any part of it without the prior written consent of the Metropolitan Fire and Emergency Services Board.<BR>
___________________________<BR>
</FONT></CODE></BODY>
</HTML>