<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2650.12">
<TITLE>RE: [MLB-WIRELESS] Workshop...</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Maybe it's time to have a Galaxy Antenna hunt and a mass modification session :-p</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>If you can make them into an 18dBi antenna like the websites say you can then i'm sure they will be useful to most people. Especially when you consider you're getting them for next to nothing..</FONT></P>
<BR>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>then there's bastards like me who pinch old 24dBi antenna's from work....</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>got me a nice hockey stick style antenna mast the other day too that's going up on the roof soon ;)</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>-----Original Message-----</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>From: Lucas Lozo [<A HREF="mailto:lucas.lozo@cdt.com.au">mailto:lucas.lozo@cdt.com.au</A>]</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Sent: Tuesday, 15 January 2002 11:14</FONT>
</P>
<BR>
<BR>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Has anyone done any testing comparing different antennas?</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>i got a old-Galaxy one as well, but is there anything better to use?</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>I mean by the time you stuffaround with it, time might be better used in making ad ifferent version up.?</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Just asking???</FONT>
</P>
<CODE><FONT SIZE=3><BR>
<BR>
___________________________<BR>
<BR>
WARNING<BR>
This email and any attachment may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient you are not authorised to copy or disclose all or any part of it without the prior written consent of the Metropolitan Fire and Emergency Services Board.<BR>
___________________________<BR>
</FONT></CODE></BODY>
</HTML>