[MLB-WIRELESS] Strange routing issues on 10.10.129.64/28 (GHO-North-5.8/HVC??)

[Robert Haines]

Hi David,

Great!! I'm not going mad!

Looks like I need to talk to Peter (JIA) ... think we need to tempoarily 
shut down this interface on HVC until they plug the cord back in on JIA!

Thanks,

Rob

On 6/03/2012 12:34 AM, David Nuttall wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> Things are going OK till you get to JLP at Heidelberg.  (10.10.81.33 
> is the incoming interface from Box Hill)
>
> After that is where it goes bad.
>
> If it goes direct to GHO (10.10.80.5) all is good.
> If it goes via HVC (10.10.2.225) it gets lost.
>
> 1)  Looking at OSPF at JLP right now, it wants to send traffic to 
> 10.10.129.64/28 via HVC with a cost of 20!  There is a cost of 10 from 
> JLP to HVC.  That suggests 10.10.129.64/28 is directly connected to 
> HVC with a cost of 10 on it's interface.
>
> 2)  I pinged all of the addresses in 10.10.129.64/28 from JLP and a 
> response came back from 10.10.129.70 on the HVC interface.  Time was 1 mS.
>
> 3)  So it looks like you are right, 10.10.129.64/28 is on both HVC and 
> GHO.
>
> 4)  A couple of guesses....  Maybe an attempt to directly link HVC 
> with GHO after JIA died?  Maybe JIA was bridging HVC and GHO?  Someone 
> will know!
>
> Dave.
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wireless.org.au/pipermail/melbwireless/attachments/20120306/872fd459/attachment-0001.html>