[MLB-WIRELESS] Re: Soekris boards

[Nick Sibbing]

Jamie Moir wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Nick Sibbing wrote:
>isn't it better to have 3 wireless cards in the box?
> 
> No, its better to have 3 wireless cards than say 4. The implication is
> that you can then have up to 3 without overlap.
> 
> > My assumptions (that I'm happy to be corrected on) are 11 channels lets
> > you have 3 non overlapping channels. One link in one link out and one
> > for the local area (eg omni) is the perfect setup?
> 
> Id just use a boring ap for a boring AP's job personally. I cant see the
> point of aggregating your home network onto the same box.
> 
Sorry that might have been ambiguous. I meant "local area"
geographically as in plain (non backbone) nodes within 2-3 kms of my
node, not as in "local area network" But if I understand correctly then
you could have a couple of wireless cards in this box and get the
desirable 3rd channel with an ordinary ap?

Regards Nick Sibbing

To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo at wireless.org.au
with "unsubscribe melbwireless" in the body of the message