[MLB-WIRELESS] Whats Faster ??
Tony Langdon, VK3JED
vk3jed at optushome.com.au
Tue Aug 12 21:34:55 EST 2003
At 09:07 PM 12/08/2003 +1000, Stuart Anderson wrote:
>Wouldn't the distance from point A to point B have something to do with it?
Well, to settle the question, wireless is fastest in terms of propagation
speed, because the signal travels at (only a tiny fraction less than) the
speed of light in air.
Cables all have a "velocity factor" less than 1, and fibre consists of
glass, which has a refractive index somewhat greater than 1 (making the
velocity factor < 1).
Couple of notes:
1. Air has a refractive index slightly greater than 1 (but not by much),
so the propagation of radio waves in air is very slightly less than that of
light.
2. Velocity factor is the ratio between the speed of propagation along the
cable and the speed of light (so actual velocity = velocity factor *
velocity of light).
73 de Tony, VK3JED
http://vkradio.com
To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo at wireless.org.au
with "unsubscribe melbwireless" in the body of the message
More information about the Melbwireless
mailing list