[MLB-WIRELESS] Network Structure - Was Re: Anyone know these people?

[Matt]

Wouldn't that be 90 degrees out of phase? 180 would just be upside down and 
still either vertical or horizontal, unless theres some aspect of this I 
don't understand.. which has happened before....
Matt
Node BCG


At 12:43 PM 25/4/2003 +1000, bchild at wireless.org.au wrote:
>Well u could run 6 links, technically speaking more, if u run them at
>different polarizations, in theory the noise floor increases true, but in
>the same respect, if they are 180 degrees out of phase then there is not
>much interference against ur other antenna, u can mount u antenna @ any
>angle u link in a directional form, so long as the other antenna is at the
>rite polarization.
>
>Regards Glen
>(Nodes AAC,FTA)
>
> > At this stage the majority of people I'm working with are going to be
> > type 2) Backbone nodes.  We have several systems setup with multiple
> > wireless cards which will use directional antennas.  Some of these nodes
> > may run AP's also preferably with 180degree antennas to cover specific
> > areas that only they can cover.  These will be aligned so as not to
> > overlap and can only be run at nodes with 2 directional links.  As you
> > can see each location can really only have a maximum of 3 wireless
> > devices in total, so 2 backbones and an AP, or 3 backbones, or 1
> > backbone and 2 AP's (weird?).
>
>
>
>
>To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo at wireless.org.au
>with "unsubscribe melbwireless" in the body of the message


To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo at wireless.org.au
with "unsubscribe melbwireless" in the body of the message