[MLB-WIRELESS] Here comes the pain...

[James Robertson]

I've read through this, and i fail to see how its a problem!

If they waive the need for a carrier licence for wireless traffic, then
that best benifits those unable to afford one.. IE, small companies and
non profit organisations.

the "serious" WISP's i've spoken to use licenced spectrums for any
critical links anyway - I'm sure most businesses who _really_ depended on
it would make sure of that.

James

On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, sanbar wrote:

> This is bad. All of a sudden the 2.4GHz band is to become very crowded.
> Just say I set up an AP with an omni right next to the wisp's AP and pump
> out 4W? Who's interests are best served - commercial or community? Who
> will adjudicate on any location/signal overlap disputes? What if my AP
> causes the commercial AP to lose business?
> *Sigh* It's now us against them. Maybe it's time to start and talk
> about strategic alliances of mutual benefit?
> Please someone tell me I am wrong.
> - Barry
>
> On 20 Sep 2002, Dale Clapperton wrote:
>
> > http://australianit.news.com.au/articles/0,7204,5134609%5E15318%5E%5Enbv%5E,00.html
> >
> >
> > THE federal Government will today sign a ministerial determination
> > allowing wireless internet companies to sidestep telecommunications
> > industry rules.


To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo at wireless.org.au
with "unsubscribe melbwireless" in the body of the message