[MLB-WIRELESS] [TECH] Dipole antennas, and melbwireless structure

[Ben Anderson]

You're removing the potential for some cross-sectional bandwidth, which IMO
needs maximising...
Though it might be the case where they do need to be excluded, like you say.
I'll let the simulation decide...

Ben.

> Ben Anderson wrote:
>
> > > If the discovery mechanism can cope with new nodes appearing anyway,
and
> > works well, then hopefully
> > > this would just be a matter of parameters - ie. shorter timeouts, more
> > re-tries, etc - for a mobile
> > > protocol.
> >
> > Yep, but there's scaling issues if we have to to a route-update across
the
> > network, for the whole network every second to keep track of nodes....
> >
> > Ben.
>
> A node that is moving fast, or otherwise behaving "badly", should not be
> involved in routing.
> Nodes should have to "earn trust" to be involved in routing.
>
>
> Jon
>
>
>
> --
> I've played piano in a whorehouse.  I've smuggled secret papers out of
> Russia...I've taught a gangster mob how to play Pinchie Winchie, sat on
the
> floor with Greta Garbo, horsed around with the Prince of Wales, played
> ping-pong with George Gershwin.  George Bernard Shaw has asked me for
advice.
> I've basked on the Riviera with Somerset Maugham and Elsa Maxwell.  I've
been
> thrown out of the casino at Monte Carlo.
>
>        - Harpo Marx
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send mail to minordomo at wireless.org.au with a subject of
'unsubscribe melbwireless'
> Archive at:
http://www.wireless.org.au/cgi-bin/minorweb.pl?A=LIST&L=melbwireless
> IRC at: au.austnet.org #melb-wireless
>


--
To unsubscribe, send mail to minordomo at wireless.org.au with a subject of 'unsubscribe melbwireless'  
Archive at: http://www.wireless.org.au/cgi-bin/minorweb.pl?A=LIST&L=melbwireless
IRC at: au.austnet.org #melb-wireless