[MLB-WIRELESS] IP addressing, OSPF and a .plan

[Tony Langdon]

>  Can we just decide to adopt net 10, net 172.16 and OSPF
>  until something better comes along? How does the saying
>  go... 'results not perfection' ??

Wel, with some minor provisos, it makes sense.

Firstly, we need to cull at least 10.0.0/24 and 172.16.0/24 from the address
ranges used, as these are common in smaller netowrks, otherwise these ranges
are fine.

I don't see public IP addresses as being an option, as IP(v4) addresses are
a scarce resource, and we're not likely to interconnect with the Internet
for some time anyway.

OSPF seems worth playing with as well.

Hmm, amateur network experimentors is starting to fit this group. :-)

This correspondence is for the named person's use only. It may contain
confidential or legally privileged information or both. No confidentiality
or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this
correspondence in error, please immediately delete it from your system and
notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or rely on any part of this
correspondence if you are not the intended recipient.

Any opinions expressed in this message are those of the individual sender.


--
To unsubscribe, send mail to minordomo at wireless.org.au with a subject of 'unsubscribe melbwireless'  
Archive at: http://www.wireless.org.au/cgi-bin/minorweb.pl?A=LIST&L=melbwireless
IRC at: au.austnet.org #melb-wireless