[MLB-WIRELESS] Reflectors and Repeaters
Hamish Moffatt
hamish at cloud.net.au
Thu Jan 3 19:37:35 EST 2002
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 03:00:57PM +1100, Tony Langdon wrote:
> As for passive, you lose 32 odd dB in a passive repeater, before any other
> losses can be considered... (I don't know the details, but there is that
Tony, can you find out the details of this? I can't see why there
should be any 32 dB constant involved. I think it should be
simple as receive antenna gain minus cable loss plus transmit
antenna gain.
This arrangement can even appear to have some gain -- which
is possible if the transmit antenna has narrower beamwidth
than the receive antenna.
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <hamish at debian.org> <hamish at cloud.net.au>
--
To unsubscribe, send mail to minordomo at melbwireless.dyndns.org with a subject of 'unsubscribe melbwireless'
Archive at: http://melbwireless.dyndns.org/cgi-bin/minorweb.pl?A=LIST&L=melbwireless
IRC at: au.austnet.org #melb-wireless
More information about the Melbwireless
mailing list