[MLB-WIRELESS] Cable Question

[Steven Haigh]

yes. RG 213 is ok for wireless networks... just keep the run to a minimum -
as it is fairly lossy at 2.4Ghz...

Signed,
Steven Haigh

The Internet was designed by the American Military back in the late 60's. It
was designed to be a decentralised information delivery system so that in
the event of a nuclear attack, American Military leaders would still have
access to pornography.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ryan Abbenhuys" <sneeze at alphalink.com.au>
To: <melbwireless at wireless.org.au>
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 2:39 PM
Subject: [MLB-WIRELESS] Cable Question


> Okay i'm just modding a Galaxy antenna while I sit here at my desk.  Found
some
> RG213 cable lying around.  Can anyone tell me if there are different types
of
> RG213?  Is it all 50Ohms and all the same stuff?
> There's not much writing on it cept for a few codes and "RG213"
>
> This stuff is alright to use for a short antenna feed isn't it?!?
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send mail to minordomo at wireless.org.au with a subject of
'unsubscribe melbwireless'
> Archive at:
http://www.wireless.org.au/cgi-bin/minorweb.pl?A=LIST&L=melbwireless
> IRC at: au.austnet.org #melb-wireless
>


--
To unsubscribe, send mail to minordomo at wireless.org.au with a subject of 'unsubscribe melbwireless'  
Archive at: http://www.wireless.org.au/cgi-bin/minorweb.pl?A=LIST&L=melbwireless
IRC at: au.austnet.org #melb-wireless