[MLB-WIRELESS] ip allocation list based on suburb

[Dave Keller]

Why not just allocate the ips whichever way required and use reverse DNS to
give more meaningful geographic information?

-------Original Message-------

From: melbwireless at wireless.org.au
Date: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 09:58:27 PM
To: melbwireless at wireless.org.au
Subject: Re: [MLB-WIRELESS] ip allocation list based on suburb

"drew at no6.com" wrote:
> 
> When I first saw this I thought, yeah, that's a cool idea... have 10.1.xx
for melb, 10.2.x.x for richmond, etc, etc. then I went to http://www
street-directory.com.au/map_australia.cgi?fileand did a grep of how many suburbs there are in Victoria... 660. so that
throws a wrench into the 255 suburb list. we could always group together the
less populated suburbs into 2 or 3 sharing one number. does anyone have a
list of the populations for all the suburbs? maybe i could automagically
generate an allocation list. that is, if we do want to go this way, which I
think still needs to be decided on.

How many councils are there?

Remember they were all amalgamated...

Dwayne


--
To unsubscribe, send mail to minordomo at wireless.org.au with a subject of 
unsubscribe melbwireless' 
Archive at: http://www.wireless.org.au/cgi-bin/minorweb
pl?AIRC at: au.austnet.org #melb-wireless

--
To unsubscribe, send mail to minordomo at wireless.org.au with a subject of 'unsubscribe melbwireless'  
Archive at: http://www.wireless.org.au/cgi-bin/minorweb.pl?A=LIST&L=melbwireless
IRC at: au.austnet.org #melb-wireless