[MLB-WIRELESS] IP address range for Geelong?

[Alexander Cohen]

Just me or I thought that it was preferable to use the reserved subnet
starting at 172.16.0.0 as opposed to
10.0.0.0 to reduce the change of overlap between already allocated private
network ips?

            --- Alex

----- Original Message -----
From: "Andy Freeman" <Andy.Freeman at jc.com.au>
To: <melbwireless at melbwireless.dyndns.org>
Cc: <geelongwireless at thirty.to>
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 1:02 PM
Subject: [MLB-WIRELESS] IP address range for Geelong?


>
> Hi Melbourne Wireless!  :-)
>
> We have a few nodes starting to pop-up in Geelong at the moment and I
> think its time that we looked at IP addresses to delegate.
>
> I read that you guys were looking at the 10.x.x.x range and think that
> we should probably grab a chunk of that so as to avoid conflicts (should
> we ever join the dots to Melbourne)
>
>
> How about delegating everything above [10.200.0.0] for Geelong?
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>                Andy.
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send mail to minordomo at wireless.org.au with a subject of
'unsubscribe melbwireless'
> Archive at:
http://www.wireless.org.au/cgi-bin/minorweb.pl?A=LIST&L=melbwireless
> IRC at: au.austnet.org #melb-wireless
>
>


--
To unsubscribe, send mail to minordomo at wireless.org.au with a subject of 'unsubscribe melbwireless'  
Archive at: http://www.wireless.org.au/cgi-bin/minorweb.pl?A=LIST&L=melbwireless
IRC at: au.austnet.org #melb-wireless