[MLB-WIRELESS] more important issues

[Tony Langdon]

> > 10.255.x.x
> > 172.31.x.x
> > 192.168.255.x
> >
> > These are all still part of the private address space.
> >
> 
> I believe in the 10.x.x.x since it would give more room to 
> manevour when the network greatly expands and
> interconnectively starts to happen between cells.

What happens if we start with 10.0.0.x...?  Keep in mind that a lot of home
networks will be using 10.0.0.x internally - Bingo!  Instant IP conflicts.
:-(  Only way to resolve those is static NAT (or just migrate to IPV6 :) ).
:)

We have to limit the range to exclude the most common IP ranges used by home
networks, but that still leaves a lot of space aside. :)

--
To unsubscribe, send mail to minordomo at melbwireless.dyndns.org with a subject of 'unsubscribe melbwireless'  
Archive of the Entire mailinst list at:
http://melbwireless.dyndns.org/cgi-bin/minorweb.pl?A=LIST&L=melbwireless