[MLB-WIRELESS] more important issues

Joseph Sirucka jsirucka at dodgyware.com
Sat Oct 27 14:31:36 EST 2001


Hi People

After a while of reading people debate about bandwidth sharing, etc, I
see that in some ways its good to talk about the future, but that
dosen't solve the present.

It seems currently that things like infrastructure need to be addressed.
Currently I have two others connected in our network/cell, and other
bigger issues than sharing bandwidth are ip allocation. Is there
sometime in the forseeable future were all supposed to be connected,
then how is this supposed to be addressed. Be our own little cell till
the cells interconnect and work out problems then or sort out the niggly
bits now peice by peice, or rebuild a network as we attach ourselves. I
would want to change ips, etc in the forseeable future.

Its all good and fair to write how to share bandwidth, but most people
are still in the thought stage and would rather want to know what is to
offer and what structure is offered.

True those issues on bandwidth are valid (in the future), and certainly
if it is to become a organisation of such I can't disagree to talk about
lawyers to form the organisation.

Back to my issue as for ip allocation allow each cell to develop its
own, and rework it, etc as it expands/merges (other cells), or have a
adressing scheme in place. Currently I'm using the 10.0.0.x addressing
range.

Also what would the domain be? x.melbournewireless.dyns.org?, or each
cell to his own.

So flame me, but these issues need to be address if for it future and
expansion.

Joseph


--
To unsubscribe, send mail to minordomo at melbwireless.dyndns.org with a subject of 'unsubscribe melbwireless'  
Archive of the Entire mailinst list at:
http://melbwireless.dyndns.org/cgi-bin/minorweb.pl?A=LIST&L=melbwireless



More information about the Melbwireless mailing list