[MLB-WIRELESS] What do people want to do with the wireless connection?

dwayne dwayne at pobox.com
Tue Nov 13 03:28:01 EST 2001


Jason Hecker wrote:

> Congestion will also be of concern, especially if en masse DivX 
> transfers start to interfere with low latency required gaming packets. 


Well, isn't there meant to be some sort of prioritisation flag built 
into IP?
Given that we control the internal network, I strongly suggest we look 
into this sort of thing, so we *can* do huge transfers while not 
interfering with gaming, telephony etc.

> I just hope a lot of punters don't have too high a watermark set for 
> the performance of their Wireless LAN. 



I'll be happy if it works.

Dwayne


--
To unsubscribe, send mail to minordomo at melbwireless.dyndns.org with a subject of 'unsubscribe melbwireless'  
Archive at: http://melbwireless.dyndns.org/cgi-bin/minorweb.pl?A=LIST&L=melbwireless
IRC at: au.austnet.org #melb-wireless



More information about the Melbwireless mailing list